From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynoso v. Kensington Management Serv., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1992
181 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 3, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.).


In this personal injury action by plaintiff against the owner, New Heights, and the managing agent, Kensington, of the Washington Heights apartment building where he was employed as the superintendent, there are questions of fact presented as to whether Kensington was plaintiff's special employer or that it had notice of the alleged defect in the fire escape ladder. New Heights, however, is clearly entitled to dismissal of the complaint as barred by the Workers' Compensation Law inasmuch as plaintiff and New Heights were parties to a Workers' Compensation Board hearing at which it was held that New Heights was plaintiff's employer. It is well settled that the Board's decision is determinative of the issue, thus precluding any party to the hearing, who had the required notice and opportunity to be heard, from relitigating such issue. (Liss v Trans Auto Sys., 68 N.Y.2d 15, 21.)

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Reynoso v. Kensington Management Serv., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1992
181 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Reynoso v. Kensington Management Serv., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PABLO REYNOSO, Respondent, v. KENSINGTON MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
580 N.Y.S.2d 341

Citing Cases

Martinez v. 250 W. 43 Owner, LLC

Noting that the defendants were not parties in interest in the worker's compensation proceedings, since they…