Reynoso v. City County of San Francisco

Full title: RICARDO REYNOSO, et al, Plaintiffs, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: May 20, 2004

Case No. C00-3626 SI (N.D. Cal. May. 20, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. C00-3626 SI.

May 20, 2004

DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney, JOANNE HOEPER, Chief Trial Attorney, DAVID B. NEWDORF, Deputy City Attorneys, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendants.

JAI M. GOHEL, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, RICARDO REYNOSO, NICKOLES DALEY AND JEROME McMURPHY.

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ACTION ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFFS RICARDO REYNOSO, NICKOLES DALEY AND JEROME McMURPHY AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS; ORDER TO CLERK TO CLOSE THE CASE FILE. [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)] Trial Date: June 7, 2004

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge

The undersigned parties, being all the parties who have appeared and remain in this action, STIPULATE through counsel, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a), that the action on behalf of plaintiffs Ricardo Reynoso, Nickoles Daley and Jerome McMurphy ("Plaintiffs") against all defendants named in the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further STIPULATED that Plaintiffs and defendants shall each pay his (or its) own costs and attorney's fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Because all claims in this action have been dismissed, the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to close the court file.