Opinion
No. 19-6311
05-21-2019
Clarence Duke Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:17-cv-00517-JLK-JCH) Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Duke Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Clarence Duke Reynolds appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. Virginia, No. 7:17-cv-00517-JLK-JCH (W.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2019). We deny Reynolds' motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED