From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Tifford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 28, 1987
506 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-783.

April 28, 1987.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Maria M. Korvick, Judge.

Max P. Engel and Louis Stoskopf, Miami, for appellant.

Arthur W. Tifford, Miami, in pro. per.

Wallace, Engels Pertnoy and Sidney M. Pertnoy, Miami, for appellee Nichols, Trustee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.


By this appeal appellant challenges several orders entered by the trial court subsequent to a final summary judgment of foreclosure.

The several grounds relied upon by appellant for reversal have been considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and we find that no reversible error has been shown. The record reflects that the cause was fully and fairly tried, that the orders appealed are fully supported by the evidence, and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by appellant did not, on the record and under the law, constitute harmful error. Therefore the orders appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Tifford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 28, 1987
506 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Tifford

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARY ARRIN REYNOLDS, APPELLANT, v. ARTHUR W. TIFFORD, AND LEON G…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 28, 1987

Citations

506 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)