From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 3, 1975
47 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

April 3, 1975


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 4, 1974, affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellants $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. We have noted the dissent. We see no reason for interfering with the jurors' assessment of damages.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Kupferman and Capozzoli, JJ.; Lynch, J., dissents in part in the following memorandum: I find no basis in the evidence for the jury's apportionment of 50% of the negligence to the defendant Thompson and 25% to each of the other two defendants. All three were co-operatively involved in the operations of 1963, 1964 and 1966 which the plaintiff's expert testified were unnecessary. While the defendant Thompson was the only one of the three to have been present at the 1962 operation, his responsibility there was the laparotomy; the nephropexy performed at that operation, and which the plaintiff's expert testified was unnecessary, was the sole responsibility of a doctor who was not sued. I would apportion negligence and damages equally.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 3, 1975
47 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:REGINA REYNOLDS, Respondent, v. JAMES E. THOMPSON et al., Appellants, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1975

Citations

47 A.D.2d 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)