From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Aug 17, 1965
178 So. 2d 97 (Ala. Crim. App. 1965)

Opinion

1 Div. 945.

June 29, 1965. Rehearing Denied August 17, 1965.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Washington County, Wm. G. Lindsey, J.

Jas. N. Granade, Chatom, for appellant.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Paul T. Gish, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The appellant was convicted of the offense denounced by Section 106, Title 14, Code 1940.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to strike the transcript of the evidence because it was not timely filed with the circuit clerk.

The judgment of conviction was rendered on April 11, 1963, and appellant gave notice of appeal on that date.

Motion for a new trial filed on June 12, 1963, was not filed within thirty days from the date on which the judgment was rendered and the court was without power to rule on said motion. Title 13, Sec. 119, Code 1940; Long v. State, 29 Ala. App. 361, 196 So. 165.

The motion for a new trial not having been timely filed, the transcript of the evidence should have been filed with the circuit clerk within sixty days after April 11, 1963, the date on which the appeal was taken. Relf v. State, 267 Ala. 3, 99 So.2d 216; Lipkin v. State, 40 Ala. App. 423, 115 So.2d 283; Lyons v. State, 40 Ala. App. 492, 115 So.2d 669. It was not filed until July 23, 1963. The motion to strike the transcript of the evidence must be granted.

We have examined the record proper and find it in all things regular.

Transcript of the evidence stricken; Judgment affirmed.

Affirmed.

CATES, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Aug 17, 1965
178 So. 2d 97 (Ala. Crim. App. 1965)
Case details for

Reynolds v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kermit B. REYNOLDS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Aug 17, 1965

Citations

178 So. 2d 97 (Ala. Crim. App. 1965)
178 So. 2d 97