From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 2002
569 S.E.2d 645 (N.C. 2002)

Opinion

No. 38A02

Filed 4 October 2002

Contempt — suspended jail sentence — criminal — appellate jurisdiction

A decision of the Court of Appeals holding that a contempt order arising from a child support action was civil rather than criminal where the court imposed an active thirty-day jail sentence suspended upon the posting of a cash bond, the payment of interest, the payment of attorney fees and the timely payment of future child support due under prior order, and that the trial court was without authority to adjudicate defendant in civil contempt because he complied with the previous orders before the hearing, is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion that the order adjudicated defendant in criminal contempt and that a district court order of criminal contempt is appealable to the superior court rather than to the Court of Appeals.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 147 N.C. App. 566, 557 S.E.2d 126 (2001), vacating in part and affirming in part an order entered 30 August 1999 by Jones (William G.), J., in District Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 September 2002.

James, McElroy Diehl, P.A., by William K. Diehl, Jr. and Preston O. Odom, III, for appellant Cynthia Flynn (formerly Reynolds). Horack, Talley, Pharr Lowndes, P.A., by Thomas R. Cannon and Kary C. Watson, for appellee David Reynolds.


For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 2002
569 S.E.2d 645 (N.C. 2002)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:DAVID P. REYNOLDS v. CYNTHIA W. REYNOLDS (now FLYNN) — CYNTHIA FLYNN…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 2002

Citations

569 S.E.2d 645 (N.C. 2002)
569 S.E.2d 645