From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Luckenbaugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00022-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00022-BNB

04-03-2012

HOOVER REYNOLDS, Plaintiff, v. H. MICHAEL LUCKENBAUGH, CLEMENT P. ENGLE, EL PASO COUNTY COURT OF COLORADO, and THE STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On February 23, 2012, the Court denied Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this action because he is subject to the filing restriction in § 1915(g). The Court also ordered Plaintiff to pay the entire $350.00 filing fee within thirty days if he wishes to pursue his claims in this action. The Court warned Plaintiff that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to pay the filing fee within thirty days.

Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee within the time allowed and he has failed to communicate with this Court in any way since the Court denied him leave to proceed in forma pauperis on February 23. Therefore, the action will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee.

Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee as directed. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 3rd day of April, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Luckenbaugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00022-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Luckenbaugh

Case Details

Full title:HOOVER REYNOLDS, Plaintiff, v. H. MICHAEL LUCKENBAUGH, CLEMENT P. ENGLE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00022-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2012)