From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Florida Mobile Homes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 7, 1967
200 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 35490.

July 7, 1967.

Petition from the Industrial Commission.

Robinson Randle, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Mathews, Osborne Ehrlich, Jacksonville, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By amended petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari, addressed to an amended order of the Florida Industrial Commission entered in this cause pursuant to mandate of this Court on rehearing, we have for review said order bearing date March 22, 1967.

We find that oral argument on said amended and cross-petition would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10; subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of said petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions are therefore denied.

Claimant's attorneys are allowed $250.00 for all services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

O'CONNELL, C.J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Florida Mobile Homes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 7, 1967
200 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Florida Mobile Homes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN T. REYNOLDS, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. FLORIDA MOBILE HOMES…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 7, 1967

Citations

200 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1967)

Citing Cases

Bossitto v. State

And at that stage, there is no constitutional right to oral argument. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S.…