From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Bank of Mount Vernon, N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1899
158 N.Y. 740 (N.Y. 1899)

Summary

In Reynolds v. Bank of Mount Vernon (6 A.D. 62) Judge CULLEN referred to this section of the Stock Corporation Law as "authority is vested in the directors to impose substantially the same restriction on the negotiability of the stock as that of which the plaintiff complains."

Summary of this case from Matter of Starbuck

Opinion

Submitted March 22, 1899

Decided April 18, 1899

Wilson Brown, Jr., for appellant.

Isaac N. Mills for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

All concur, except VANN, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Bank of Mount Vernon, N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1899
158 N.Y. 740 (N.Y. 1899)

In Reynolds v. Bank of Mount Vernon (6 A.D. 62) Judge CULLEN referred to this section of the Stock Corporation Law as "authority is vested in the directors to impose substantially the same restriction on the negotiability of the stock as that of which the plaintiff complains."

Summary of this case from Matter of Starbuck
Case details for

Reynolds v. Bank of Mount Vernon, N.Y

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. REYNOLDS, a Stockholder of the Bank of Mount Vernon, N.Y., and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 18, 1899

Citations

158 N.Y. 740 (N.Y. 1899)

Citing Cases

Matter of Starbuck

The Appellate Division decided that "the defendant should have judgment to the effect that it is not obliged…