Opinion
Civil Action No. 2:85cv665-MHT (WO).
February 7, 2006
ORDER
With the understanding that the defendants' motion for summary judgment on Article XIV compliance (Doc. No. 7777) is not granted as to paragraph 3 of Article XIV and after a de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The plaintiffs' objection (Doc. No. 7935) to Special Master González's report and recommendation is overruled.
(2) The Special Master's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7824), as amended (Doc. Nos. 7906 7929), is adopted.
(3) The defendants' motion for summary judgment on Article XIV compliance (Doc. No. 7777) is granted in part and denied in part.
(4) The defendants' motion for a finding of compliance with Article XIV (Doc. No. 7453) is granted as to ¶¶ 1 2(a).
(5) The court reserves judgment on the defendants' motion for a finding of compliance with Article XIV (Doc. No. 7453) as to ¶¶ 2(b) 3, pending further report and recommendation by the Special Master.