From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 12, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-2711 CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:14-cv-2711 CKD P

05-12-2015

DAVID REYES, Plaintiff, v. A. YOUNG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed January 23, 2015, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days' leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On March 3, 2015, plaintiff was granted a sixty-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. The sixty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court assign a district judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: May 12, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2 / reye2711.fta


Summaries of

Reyes v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 12, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-2711 CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Reyes v. Young

Case Details

Full title:DAVID REYES, Plaintiff, v. A. YOUNG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 12, 2015

Citations

No. 2:14-cv-2711 CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2015)