From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Riverside Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 2009
59 A.D.3d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

February 10, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered June 23, 2008, which denied defendants-appellants' motion for an order directing the issuance of a commission pursuant to CPLR 3108 to examine a nonparty witness in California, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, McGuire, Moskowitz and Freedman, JJ.


The motion court properly denied the motion since "absent allegations that the proposed out-of-State deponent would not cooperate with a notice of deposition or would not voluntarily come within this State or that 'the judicial imprimatur accompanying a commission will be necessary or helpful when the [designee] seeks the assistance of the foreign court in compelling the witness to attend the examination', the [appellants have] failed to demonstrate that a commission is 'necessary or convenient'" ( Susan A. v Steven J.A., 141 AD2d 790, 791 [citation omitted], quoting Wiseman v American Motors Sales Corp., 103 AD2d 230, 235; see also Lewis v Baker, 279 AD2d 380, 380-381). Motion seeking leave to strike portions of the reply brief denied.


Summaries of

Reyes v. Riverside Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 2009
59 A.D.3d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Reyes v. Riverside Park

Case Details

Full title:NAOMI REYES, Respondent, v. RIVERSIDE PARK COMMUNITY (STAGE I), INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
873 N.Y.S.2d 58

Citing Cases

Behar v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.

An open commission may be issued where necessary or convenient for the taking of a deposition outside of the…