From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Liberman Broadcasting

Supreme Court of California
Dec 12, 2012
149 Cal. Rptr. 3d 675 (Cal. 2012)

Summary

holding that defendant reasonably concluded that it could not enforce an arbitration agreement under Gentry and therefore did not waive its right to compel arbitration

Summary of this case from Ontiveros v. Zamora

Opinion

No. S205907.

2012-12-12

REYES v. LIBERMAN BROADCASTING.


Prior report: Cal.App., 146 Cal.Rptr.3d 616

The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation of Los Angeles, (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.

CANTIL–SAKAUYE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, CORRIGAN and LIU, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reyes v. Liberman Broadcasting

Supreme Court of California
Dec 12, 2012
149 Cal. Rptr. 3d 675 (Cal. 2012)

holding that defendant reasonably concluded that it could not enforce an arbitration agreement under Gentry and therefore did not waive its right to compel arbitration

Summary of this case from Ontiveros v. Zamora
Case details for

Reyes v. Liberman Broadcasting

Case Details

Full title:REYES v. LIBERMAN BROADCASTING.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

149 Cal. Rptr. 3d 675 (Cal. 2012)
149 Cal. Rptr. 3d 675

Citing Cases

Ontiveros v. Zamora

While the Agreement does not include an explicit class arbitration waiver, at least two California Courts of…

Whatley v. Johnson

None mentions the doctrine of ineffective assistance of counsel. (See People v. Yartz (2005) 37 Cal.4th 529,…