From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Entzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG
Feb 13, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:18-CV-40 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 13, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:18-CV-40

02-13-2019

REINALDO REYES, Petitioner, v. ENTZEL, Warden, Respondent.


(GROH)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rules, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Trumble for submission of a proposed R&R. Magistrate Judge Trumble issued his R&R [ECF No. 9] on January 30, 2019. Therein, Magistrate Judge Trumble recommends that the Petitioner's § 2241 petition [ECF No. 1] be denied and dismissed without prejudice.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court must conduct a de novo review of the magistrate judge's findings where objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and of a petitioner's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28.U.S.C..§ 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Objections to Magistrate Judge Trumble's R&R were due within fourteen plus three days of service. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The R&R was not mailed to the Petitioner because the Petitioner was released from BOP custody on October 11, 2018, and never updated his mailing address. ECF No. 9. Accordingly, the Petitioner did not file objections. However, "all pro se litigants are responsible for promptly informing the Court of any change in their address, monitoring the progress of their case, and prosecuting or defending their actions diligently." LR PL P 6. Failure to notify the Clerk of Court of an address change will result in dismissal of the prisoner's case. Id. Thus, this Court will review the R&R for clear error.

Upon careful review of the R&R, it is the opinion of this Court that Magistrate Judge Trumble's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] should be, and is hereby, ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated therein. Therefore, the Petitioner's § 2241 Petition [ECF No. 1] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

This matter is ORDERED STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the Petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested, at his last known address as reflected on the docket sheet.

DATED: February 13, 2019

/s/_________

GINA M. GROH

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Reyes v. Entzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG
Feb 13, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:18-CV-40 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 13, 2019)
Case details for

Reyes v. Entzel

Case Details

Full title:REINALDO REYES, Petitioner, v. ENTZEL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG

Date published: Feb 13, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:18-CV-40 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 13, 2019)