From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Colosseum, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Feb 16, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-286-FtM-38DNF (M.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2015)

Opinion

Case No: 2:14-cv-286-FtM-38DNF

02-16-2015

AMBER REYES, on her own behalf and all similarly situated individuals Plaintiff, v. COLOSSEUM, LLC, DAVID TOWNSEND and LYNN PIPPENGER, Defendants.


ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Douglas Frazier (Doc. #35) filed on February 12, 2015. Magistrate Judge Frazier recommends granting the Parties' Joint Motion to Review and Approve FLSA Settlement Agreement and Dismiss Action with Prejudice (Doc. #34) filed on February 6, 2015, and dismissing the case with prejudice. Neither Party objects.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Frazier.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Douglas Frazier Approving the Parties Settlement of their FLSA dispute (Doc. #35) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.

2. The Parties' Joint Motion to Review and Approve FLSA Settlement Agreement and Dismiss Action With Prejudice (Doc. #34) is GRANTED, and the parties' Settlement Agreement and FLSA Release (Doc. #34-1) is approved as fair and reasonable.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, DISMISS the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and CLOSE the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 16th day of February, 2015.

/s/_________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

Reyes v. Colosseum, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Feb 16, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-286-FtM-38DNF (M.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Reyes v. Colosseum, LLC

Case Details

Full title:AMBER REYES, on her own behalf and all similarly situated individuals…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 16, 2015

Citations

Case No: 2:14-cv-286-FtM-38DNF (M.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2015)