From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Cash

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 28, 2014
No. EDCV 13-1248 ODW (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2014)

Summary

noting that a petitioner who had pled guilty had his state habeas petition denied on procedural grounds, including by Dixon

Summary of this case from Lee v. Jacquez

Opinion

No. EDCV 13-1248 ODW (FFM)

07-28-2014

JOEL REYES, Petitioner, v. S.B. CASH, Warden Respondent


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition on the merits with prejudice. DATED: July 28, 2014

/s/_________

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Reyes v. Cash

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 28, 2014
No. EDCV 13-1248 ODW (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2014)

noting that a petitioner who had pled guilty had his state habeas petition denied on procedural grounds, including by Dixon

Summary of this case from Lee v. Jacquez
Case details for

Reyes v. Cash

Case Details

Full title:JOEL REYES, Petitioner, v. S.B. CASH, Warden Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 28, 2014

Citations

No. EDCV 13-1248 ODW (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2014)

Citing Cases

Lee v. Jacquez

Since California courts regularly employ multiple procedural bars to deny petitions with multiple claims (as…