Opinion
Civil Action No. 06-cv-02319-WDM-BNB.
February 26, 2008
ORDER
This matter is before me on the Arapahoe Defendants' Motion to Compel [Doc. # 130, filed 2/4/2008] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART as follows:
GRANTED to require the plaintiff to fully and completely answer under oath and in accordance with the requirements of Rule 33, Fed.R.Civ.P., Interrogatories No. 8 and 10 (of defendants' requests dated July 13, 2007) and Interrogatory No. 3 (of defendants' requests dated September 24, 2007);
DENIED AS MOOT with respect to Interrogatories 4, 6, and 7 and Production Request No. 2 (of defendants' requests dated July 13, 2007); and
DENIED in all other respects.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall make supplemental discovery responses consistent with this order on or before March 7, 2008.