From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Bank of Am., NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 15, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CV-01367-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-01367-KJD-CWH

11-15-2012

LISA REYES, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA , et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On October 3, 2012, Plaintiff and Defendants stipulated that Defendants should have an extension of time up to and including November 1, 2012, to file their Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. The Court did not enter this stipulation. However, Defendants failed to file a timely reply or a reply on the stipulated date of November 1, 2012.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall have 7 days from the date of this Order to file their reply, if any, to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint.

_______________

Kent J. Dawson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Reyes v. Bank of Am., NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 15, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CV-01367-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Reyes v. Bank of Am., NA

Case Details

Full title:LISA REYES, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA , et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 15, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-01367-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 15, 2012)