Opinion
December Term, 1848
R.W. Peckham, for appellants.
N. Hill, Jun. for respondents.
THE COURT, upon the authority of the case cited, were of opinion that the bill could not be sustained, and thereupon the decree of the chancellor was affirmed.¹
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Rexford v. Widger
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1848
2 N.Y. 131 (N.Y. 1848)
Summaries of
Rexford v. Widger
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1848
2 N.Y. 131 (N.Y. 1848)
Case details for
Rexford v. Widger
Case Details
Full title:REXFORD et al. vs . WIDGER et al
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 1, 1848
Citations
2 N.Y. 131 (N.Y. 1848)
Citing Cases
Yormark v. Waldman
So following this rule it was held that a mortgagee of real property which was subject to the lien of a prior…
Reich v. Cochranthe plaintiff, it is strenuously insisted that the court has no power to impose the above condition that the…