From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rex v. Fla. Legislature

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Dec 27, 2014
CASE NO. 4:14cv17-RH/CAS (N.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:14cv17-RH/CAS

12-27-2014

DARLENE R. REX, Plaintiff, v. THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The defendant has moved for summary judgment. On a summary-judgment motion, factual disputes must be resolved, and all reasonable inferences must be drawn, in favor of the nonmoving party. The question is whether the moving party is entitled to judgment even when the facts are viewed that way. Here the answer is no. This case presents genuine factual disputes that can be resolved only at trial.

This does not mean the issues should not be narrowed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(g) or as part of the pretrial process. This will be addressed at the pretrial conference.

SO ORDERED on December 27, 2014.

s/ Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rex v. Fla. Legislature

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Dec 27, 2014
CASE NO. 4:14cv17-RH/CAS (N.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2014)
Case details for

Rex v. Fla. Legislature

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE R. REX, Plaintiff, v. THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 27, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 4:14cv17-RH/CAS (N.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2014)