From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Revutsky v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

November, 1934.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.


Motion to dismiss appeals denied, with leave to respondent to renew upon the argument of the appeals. Section 282 of the Civil Practice Act was repealed in 1932 (Laws of 1932, chap. 224) and cannot, therefore, be invoked to support the motion. We think that the question as to the effect of such repeal should be considered by this court after full argument. Prior to section 282, the rule seems to have been the same as that provided in the statute. ( Keepers v. Hartley Company, 150 App. Div. 252.)


Summaries of

Revutsky v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Revutsky v. Fuller

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM REVUTSKY, as Administrator, etc., of MIRIAM REVUTSKY, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)