From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Revutsky v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

December, 1934.


Order denying the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint affirmed, without costs. ( Lynch v. Erie Railroad Co., 236 App. Div. 805; Lustig v. N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co., 65 Hun, 547; United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co., 288 U.S. 62, 68.) Order granting plaintiff's motion to serve an amended complaint modified by eliminating therefrom the paragraph "Ordered that the defendants are not entitled to nor shall they plead to said amended complaint the Statute of Limitations specified in the `Death' Statute of the State of New Jersey." As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Motion No. 1250 ( 242 App. Div. 838), to dismiss appeals, renewed upon the argument, dismissed. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Revutsky v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Revutsky v. Fuller

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM REVUTSKY, as Administrator, etc., of MIRIAM REVUTSKY, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1934

Citations

243 App. Div. 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)