From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Revheim v. Shankman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1944
293 N.Y. 850 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued October 16, 1944

Decided November 22, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, BERNSTEIN, J.

Herbert D. Cohen and Alexander H. Carroad for plaintiffs-appellants and respondents.

I. Maurice Wormser and Joseph L. Giller for defendants-respondents and appellants.


Judgment, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff, affirmed; and judgment, insofar as appealed from by defendants, reversed, and the supplemental complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs in all courts to the defendants, on the ground that the executory accord was invalid under section 33-a, subdivision 2, of the Personal Property Law, and that there was no breach of the agreement alleged in the original complaint. No opinion. (See 294 N.Y. 662.)

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ.


Summaries of

Revheim v. Shankman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1944
293 N.Y. 850 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

Revheim v. Shankman

Case Details

Full title:SIGURD REVHEIM et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. SAMUEL B. SHANKMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1944

Citations

293 N.Y. 850 (N.Y. 1944)
59 N.E.2d 441