From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Revels v. Meyers

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 25, 2009
CV 04-7227-DDP (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2009)

Opinion


JOHN REVELS, Plaintiff, v. R. MEYERS, et al., Defendants. No. CV 04-7227-DDP (MAN) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 25, 2009

          ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed on February 3, 2009, and defendant's Objections filed on March 2, 2009. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the matters to which objections have been stated. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment brought by defendant Robert Meyers, M.D., pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is DENIED.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of the Order on plaintiff and on counsel for defendants.


Summaries of

Revels v. Meyers

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 25, 2009
CV 04-7227-DDP (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Revels v. Meyers

Case Details

Full title:JOHN REVELS, Plaintiff, v. R. MEYERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 25, 2009

Citations

CV 04-7227-DDP (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Clark

Numerous federal courts have found that keloids, under certain circumstances, are sufficiently serious to…

Rushdan v. Hamkar

Here, the court assumes for screening purposes that plaintiff's keloids constitute a serious medical need.…