From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reusens v. Arkenburgh

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1911
96 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued October 10, 1911

Decided October 24, 1911

Edgar J. Nathan for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Herman B. Goodstein and Harry A. Gordon for defendant, respondent and appellant.


Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ. Absent: VANN, J.


Summaries of

Reusens v. Arkenburgh

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1911
96 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Reusens v. Arkenburgh

Case Details

Full title:GUILLAUME REUSENS, Appellant and Respondent, v . OLIVER M. ARKENBURGH…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1911

Citations

96 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1911)
96 N.E. 1128