Opinion
Submitted April 6, 1992
Decided June 9, 1992
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).
Submitted April 6, 1992
Decided June 9, 1992
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).
Full title:CHANNING REUSCHENBERG et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF HUNTINGTON, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 9, 1992