Opinion
April 22, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.).
Defendant-appellant Siegel has failed to raise any meritorious arguments, either with respect to the validity of the Pennsylvania money judgment against him or with respect to the validity of the various orders and judgments presently appealed in this action to enforce the Pennsylvania judgment. As to plaintiffs cross appeal, we note only that the motion court's refusal to impose sanctions in addition to those already imposed was, under the circumstances, an appropriate exercise of discretion ( see, Odette Realty Co. v. DiBianco, 170 A.D.2d 299).
Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.