From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Retamozzo v. Friedland

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 16, 2015
127 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

04-16-2015

Armand RETAMOZZO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Diana FRIEDLAND, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Louis Rosado and Associates, Buffalo (Louis Rosado of counsel), for appellant. Nixon Peabody LLP, Jericho (Alexander E. Gallin of counsel), for Jason Quinones and Manuel Chaparro, respondents. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Bethany A. Davis Noll of counsel), for Diana Friedland, Michelle Miranda, Francis Sheehan, Brian Murphy and Michele Doney, respondents.


Louis Rosado and Associates, Buffalo (Louis Rosado of counsel), for appellant.

Nixon Peabody LLP, Jericho (Alexander E. Gallin of counsel), for Jason Quinones and Manuel Chaparro, respondents.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Bethany A. Davis Noll of counsel), for Diana Friedland, Michelle Miranda, Francis Sheehan, Brian Murphy and Michele Doney, respondents.

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered June 3, 2013, which denied plaintiff's motion to vacate an order and ensuing judgment dismissing plaintiff's verified amended complaint as a sanction for willfully refusing to comply with discovery orders, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no basis for vacating the order and ensuing judgment. Even if CPLR 5015(a)(1) is applicable, plaintiff failed to provide a reasonable excuse for not moving to confirm or reject a special referee's report recommending a conditional dismissal of the amended complaint due to plaintiff's willful noncompliance with discovery orders (see 22 NYCRR 202.44 [a] ). Plaintiff's contention that he did not have notice of the filing of the report is “demonstrably false,” as the record shows that the report was filed and published online on May 10, 2012, and that on May 22, 2012 defense counsel informed plaintiff of the report's online publication (Wilf v. Halpern, 234 A.D.2d 154, 154, 651 N.Y.S.2d 30 [1st Dept.1996] ).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, MANZANET–DANIELS, CLARK, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Retamozzo v. Friedland

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 16, 2015
127 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Retamozzo v. Friedland

Case Details

Full title:Armand RETAMOZZO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Diana FRIEDLAND, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 16, 2015

Citations

127 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 3237
5 N.Y.S.3d 728