Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-03050-REB-BNB, (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 10-cv-03051-REB-BNB).
June 6, 2011
ORDER
This matter arises on the following:
(1) Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint [Doc. # 43, filed in 10-cv-3050] (the "Motion to Amend Ressler Complaint");
(2) Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint [Doc. # 35, filed in 10-cv-3051] (the "Motion to Amend Felipe Complaint"); and
(3) Unopposed Motion to Modify Expert Designation Dates [Doc. # 46, filed in the consolidated case] (the "Motion to Extension").
At the time the motions to amend were filed, the cases had not been consolidated. Now that they are, efficiency would be served by having a single amended consolidated complaint.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Motion to Amend Ressler Complaint [Doc. # 43] and Motion to Amend Felipe Complaint [Doc. # 35] are DENIED without prejudice. The plaintiffs may seek leave to file a singled Amended Consolidated Complaint; and
(2) The Motion for Extension [Doc. # 46] is GRANTED. The case schedule for the consolidated case is modified to the following extent:
Expert Disclosures:
(a) The plaintiffs shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) on or before August 15, 2011
(b) The defendants shall designate all experts and rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) on or before September 15, 2011
(c) The plaintiffs shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) on or before October 15, 2011.