From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Respall v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 23, 2022
No. 13732-20S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

13732-20S

03-23-2022

Yamisliany Yanet Machado Respall Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION

Kathleen Kerrigan, Judge.

On March 21, 2022, respondent filed a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution, asking the Court to find that there is no deficiency in tax due from petitioner for the taxable year 2018. Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is further

ORDERED and DECIDED that there is no deficiency in tax due from petitioner for the taxable year 2018.


Summaries of

Respall v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 23, 2022
No. 13732-20S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Respall v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Yamisliany Yanet Machado Respall Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

No. 13732-20S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 23, 2022)