From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RESNICK v. EAST BRUNSWICK TP. BD. OF ED

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Nov 16, 1976
144 N.J. Super. 474 (App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

Argued November 1, 1976 —

Decided November 16, 1976.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

Before Judges BISCHOFF, MORGAN and COLLESTER.

Mr. Frank J. Rubin argued the cause for East Brunswick Board of Education ( Messrs. Rubin Lerner, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel H. Davis argued the cause for Reform Temple of East Brunswick ( Messrs. Dubowsky Davis, attorneys).

Mr. Seymour Gelzer filed a brief and was permitted to argue the cause for East Brunswick Baptist Church, even though no notice of appeal was filed ( Messrs. Iaria and Gelzer, attorneys).

Mr. Sanford Rader argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Kovacs, Anderson, Horowitz Rader, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the trial court, reported at 135 N.J. Super. 257.


Summaries of

RESNICK v. EAST BRUNSWICK TP. BD. OF ED

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Nov 16, 1976
144 N.J. Super. 474 (App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

RESNICK v. EAST BRUNSWICK TP. BD. OF ED

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM RESNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Nov 16, 1976

Citations

144 N.J. Super. 474 (App. Div. 1976)
366 A.2d 345

Citing Cases

Resnick v. East Brunswick Township Board of Education

Upon consolidating these appeals the Appellate Division heard arguments and affirmed "substantially for the…

Fair Lawn Education Ass'n v. Fair Lawn Board of Education

It is, of course, fundamental that local boards of education, as creations of the State, are capable of…