From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Resetarits Constr. Corp. v. City of Niagara Falls

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Nov 13, 2015
133 A.D.3d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

1119 CA 15-00492

11-13-2015

RESETARITS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent, v. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, Defendant–Respondent–Appellant.

Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP, Buffalo (Joseph J. Manna of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent. Craig H. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, Niagara Falls (Thomas M. O'Donnell of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent–Appellant.


Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP, Buffalo (Joseph J. Manna of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent.

Craig H. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, Niagara Falls (Thomas M. O'Donnell of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent–Appellant.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM:

In this action to recover damages for breach of contract arising from a construction project, plaintiff appeals and defendant cross-appeals from an order that denied their respective motion and cross motion seeking, inter alia, summary judgment. We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We write only to address plaintiff's contentions regarding the denial of that part of its motion seeking to preclude defendant from presenting certain evidence at trial based on defendant's failure to comply with prior discovery orders. The court concluded that defendant had submitted a letter and other documents in response to the prior discovery orders demonstrating that defendant had complied with the prior orders. Plaintiff failed to include those documents in the record on appeal, however, and we thus are unable to review plaintiff's present contention that the court erred in determining that the documents were sufficient to establish defendant's compliance with the prior orders. Plaintiff, as the party raising this issue on its appeal, “submitted this appeal on an incomplete record and must suffer the consequences” (Matter of Santoshia L., 202 A.D.2d 1027, 1028, 609 N.Y.S.2d 724 ; see Killian v. Heiman, 105 A.D.3d 1459, 1459–1460, 963 N.Y.S.2d 918 ; Matter of Rodriguez v. Ward, 43 A.D.3d 640, 641, 842 N.Y.S.2d 622 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, and VALENTINO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Resetarits Constr. Corp. v. City of Niagara Falls

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Nov 13, 2015
133 A.D.3d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Resetarits Constr. Corp. v. City of Niagara Falls

Case Details

Full title:RESETARITS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2015

Citations

133 A.D.3d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8266
18 N.Y.S.3d 914

Citing Cases

People v. Stallone

We are unable to determine the merits of petitioner's contentions on appeal inasmuch as the 40–page record…

Montanaro v. Weichert

al No. 2], 108 A.D.3d 1127, 1128, 969 N.Y.S.2d 348 [4th Dept. 2013] ; see CPLR 5511 ), and thus the appeal…