From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reserve Insurance Company v. Pollock

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 15, 1972
270 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Summary

holding that insurer who admitted liability under insurance policy was "estopped from taking an inconsistent position" on appeal

Summary of this case from Dickson v. Econ. Prem. Assu. Co.

Opinion

No. 72-974.

December 15, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ralph O. Cullen, J.

Cowart Onett, Miami, for appellants.

Abraham H. Shukat, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.


This is an interlocutory appeal taken by defendant-appellant, Reserve Insurance Company, to review an adverse partial summary judgment on liability granted by the lower court.

Plaintiff-appellee, Willie H. Pollock, is the administrator of the estate of Joseph Daniels who died as a result of a collision with an uninsured automobile. Seeking to collect damages under the uninsured motorist provision of his insurance policy, plaintiff filed a lawsuit against his insurance carrier, Reserve Insurance Company, and the uninsured motorist.

Defendant insurance company moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint or to compel arbitration pursuant to the insurance policy. The court below then ordered arbitration and a dismissal of the complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff's petition for rehearing was denied and he took an appeal to this court. The subsequent opinion, Pollock v. Reserve Insurance Company, Fla. App. 1972, 258 So.2d 328, reversed the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings on the basis that the insurance company waived its right to arbitration. Following compliance by the lower court with that opinion, plaintiff moved for a partial summary judgment as to the insurance company's liability. The motion was granted and this appeal ensued.

As a matter of law defendant insurance company admitted coverage under the policy by the filing of its application for arbitration. Volkswagen Insurance Company v. Taylor, Fla.App. 1967, 201 So.2d 624; Netherlands Insurance Company v. Moore, Fla.App. 1966, 190 So.2d 191. We hold that defendant-appellant admitted its liability under the policy when it moved for arbitration, and it is estopped from taking an inconsistent position on this subsequent appeal. Palm Beach Co. v. Palm Beach Estates, 110 Fla. 77, 148 So. 544 (1933).

The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Reserve Insurance Company v. Pollock

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 15, 1972
270 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

holding that insurer who admitted liability under insurance policy was "estopped from taking an inconsistent position" on appeal

Summary of this case from Dickson v. Econ. Prem. Assu. Co.

holding that defendant-appellant which "admitted its liability" under insurance policy was "estopped from taking an inconsistent position" on appeal

Summary of this case from Harper ex Rel. Daley v. Toler
Case details for

Reserve Insurance Company v. Pollock

Case Details

Full title:RESERVE INSURANCE COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 15, 1972

Citations

270 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Technical Packaging v. Hanchett

By averring that only the three latest orders entailed five-year limitations periods, Technical was tacitly…

Tech. Packaging v. Hanchett

By averring that only the three latest orders entailed five-year limitations periods, Technical was tacitly…