From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Res-Care, Inc. v. Roto-Rooter Services Company

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Aug 10, 2010
Case No. CV 09 3856 EDL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. CV 09 3856 EDL.

August 10, 2010

Richard S. Diestel, No. 095059, Alison M. Crane, No. 197359, BLEDSOE, CATHCART, DIESTEL, PEDERSEN TREPPA, LLP, San Francisco, California, William J. Cremer, ( Admitted Pro Hac Vice), Thomas R. Pender, ( Admitted Pro Hac Vice), CREMER, SPINA, SHAUGHNESSY, JANSEN SIEGERT, LLC, Chicago, Illinois, Attorneys for Defendant, LEONARD VALVE COMPANY.


Complaint Filed: August 21, 2009


[PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING LEONARD VALVE'S COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE AND INSURER TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE


The request of defendant LEONARD VALVE COMPANY to not have its company representative and insurer physically present at the continued settlement conference on September 7, 2010 has been considered by the Court. The Court grants LEONARD VALVE's request and orders LEONARD VALVE to be represented in person by its counsel at the continued settlement conference. LEONARD VALVE's company representative and insurer are ordered to be available by phone for this conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Res-Care, Inc. v. Roto-Rooter Services Company

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Aug 10, 2010
Case No. CV 09 3856 EDL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Res-Care, Inc. v. Roto-Rooter Services Company

Case Details

Full title:RES-CARE, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY, ROTO-ROOTER…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Aug 10, 2010

Citations

Case No. CV 09 3856 EDL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2010)