holding insurer must pay for losses resulting from injuries incurred while insurance in effect because policy did not clearly and expressly set forth the nature of the limitation on coverage
Summary of this case from State v. University Physicians, Inc.No. 82-645
December 6, 1982.
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 132 Ariz. 529, 647 P. 2d 1127.
holding insurer must pay for losses resulting from injuries incurred while insurance in effect because policy did not clearly and expressly set forth the nature of the limitation on coverage
Summary of this case from State v. University Physicians, Inc.affirming default judgment entered against a defendant corporation where corporate officers failed to show up for depositions and corporation did not adequately respond to interrogatories
Summary of this case from Young v. Johnny Ribeiro Buildingapproving an award of attorneys' fees under A.R.S. § 12-341.01 in an insurance bad faith case as "arising out of a contract" because the tort claim could not exist but for the breach of contract
Summary of this case from Carpenter v. CarpenterFull title:REPUBLIC NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL. v. SPARKS ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 6, 1982
This ambiguity exists despite the brochure's statement that it is subject to the conditions expressed in the…
United Artists Corp. v. La Cage Aux Folles, Inc.At least three other circuits have expressed their willingness to apply the "unique circumstances" doctrine…