Opinion
March 4, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, a question of fact exists with respect to whether the injuries at issue were the accidental result of the intentional act of the plaintiff's insured (see, Barry v Romanosky, 147 A.D.2d 605; see also, D'Arata v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 76 N.Y.2d 659, 667). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Kunzeman, J.P., Kooper, Harwood and O'Brien, JJ., concur.