From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Republic Franklin Ins. v. L J Rlty. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 14, 2001
280 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

February 14, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered April 18, 2000, which denied plaintiff-insurer's motion for summary judgment declaring that it is under no obligation to defend or indemnify defendant insureds in the underlying action and to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 defendants' counterclaims for bad faith denial of coverage, unanimously modified, on the law and upon a search of the record, to grant defendant insureds summary judgment declaring that, under the subject policy of insurance, plaintiff insurer must defend and indemnify them in the underlying action and to grant plaintiff insurer's motion insofar as it seeks dismissal of defendants' counterclaims pursuant to CPLR 3211, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Maureen E. Scott, for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael B. Doyle, for defendants-respondents.


Defendant building owners and operators, during the relevant period, were insured under a general business policy issued by plaintiff that contains a pollution exclusion clause. That clause was properly found by the IAS court to be inapplicable to relieve plaintiff insurer of its obligation to defend and indemnify in the underlying personal injury action since the plaintiff in that underlying action did not allege injury attributable to a pollutant that had either emanated from a source outside the building or in some manner escaped from defendant insureds' premises, but rather to fumes that remained contained within the premises (see, Vigilant Ins. Co. v. V.I. Technologies, Inc., 253 A.D.2d 401; see also, Cont. Cas. Co. v. Rapid-Am. Corp., 80 N.Y.2d 640, 652-655).

Plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants' counterclaims should, however, have been granted. In view, inter alia, of the fact that plaintiff insurer has defended the underlying personal injury action while litigating the issues respecting the scope of its obligation under the subject policy, defendants possess no sustainable claim for a bad faith denial of coverage.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Republic Franklin Ins. v. L J Rlty. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 14, 2001
280 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Republic Franklin Ins. v. L J Rlty. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:REPUBLIC FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LJ REALTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 14, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 473

Citing Cases

Belt Painting Corp. v. TIG Insurance

eliminate coverage in cases involving ingestion of lead paint (see e.g. Cepeda v. Varveris, 234 A.D.2d 497;…