From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Repa v. Napierkowski

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division
May 6, 2022
1:19-cv-00101-RAL (W.D. Pa. May. 6, 2022)

Opinion

1:19-cv-00101-RAL

05-06-2022

ROBERT REPA AND JEAN REP A, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Plaintiffs v. FRANK NAPIERKOWSKI, HILLTRUX TANK LINES, INC., Defendants


PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT OF PLAINTIFFS' DISCIPLINARY HISTORY OR FILE WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT [ECF NO. 81] ORDER

RICHARD A. LANZILLO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiffs have moved in limine to exclude “all evidence or argument related to Mr. Repa's disciplinary history with the Cambridge Springs Volunteer Fire Department.” ECF No. 81 (citing, inter alia, Fed.R.Evid. 404(a)). Defendants “agree that this evidence is generally inadmissible at trial” and do not oppose the requested exclusion. ECF No. 107, ¶ 2. Therefore, Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED. Defendants may, however, consistent with the Federal Rules of Evidence, utilize such evidence at trial z/Plaintiffs open the door by introduction of character evidence putting the matter at issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Repa v. Napierkowski

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division
May 6, 2022
1:19-cv-00101-RAL (W.D. Pa. May. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Repa v. Napierkowski

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT REPA AND JEAN REP A, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Plaintiffs v. FRANK…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division

Date published: May 6, 2022

Citations

1:19-cv-00101-RAL (W.D. Pa. May. 6, 2022)