From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Renwick v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 2023
221 A.D.3d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

1057 Index No. 26859/20E Case No. 2022–04796

11-21-2023

Richard RENWICK, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Jhamal A. MITCHELL et al., Defendants–Appellants, Michael R. Liriano, Defendant–Respondent.

Law Office of Eric D. Feldman, New York (Evy L. Kazansky of counsel), for appellants. Harris Keenan & Goldfarb PLLC, New York (Yamile Kalkach of counsel), for Richard Renwick, respondent. Law Office of Dennis C. Bartling, Melville (Jill Dabrowski of counsel), for Michael R. Liriano, respondent.


Law Office of Eric D. Feldman, New York (Evy L. Kazansky of counsel), for appellants.

Harris Keenan & Goldfarb PLLC, New York (Yamile Kalkach of counsel), for Richard Renwick, respondent.

Law Office of Dennis C. Bartling, Melville (Jill Dabrowski of counsel), for Michael R. Liriano, respondent.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Kapnick, Oing, Pitt–Burke, Higgitt, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bianka Perez, J.), entered October 12, 2022, which denied defendants Jhamal A. Mitchell and Starfire Industries Inc.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross-claims as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Mitchell and Starfire failed to establish their entitlement to summary judgment because they did not submit evidence showing that they were free from negligence as a matter of law, nor did they submit evidence showing that any alleged negligence by defendant Michael R. Liriano was the sole cause of the accident (see Harrigan v. Sow, 165 A.D.3d 463, 464, 85 N.Y.S.3d 424 [1st Dept. 2018] ). Furthermore, Mitchell's and Liriano's conflicting deposition testimony created questions of fact as to defendants’ liability (see Colon v. Woolco Foods Inc., 177 A.D.3d 498, 498, 110 N.Y.S.3d 551 [1st Dept. 2019] ), and credibility issues are reserved for the factfinder's consideration (see Bliss v. State of New York, 95 N.Y.2d 911, 913, 719 N.Y.S.2d 631, 742 N.E.2d 106 [2000] ; Acevedo v. Morton W. Assoc., 227 A.D.2d 280, 281, 642 N.Y.S.2d 311 [1st Dept. 1996] ).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Renwick v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 2023
221 A.D.3d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Renwick v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:Richard Renwick, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jhamal A. Mitchell et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2023

Citations

221 A.D.3d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
198 N.Y.S.3d 349
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 5995

Citing Cases

Cox v. Seniorcare Emergency Med. Servs.

Defendants did not establish their entitlement to summary judgment, as the record presents triable issues of…