From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Renteria-Saldana v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 20, 2014
574 U.S. 968 (2014)

Summary

finding enhancement proper where the defendant did not own or reside at the stash house, but exercised control over it by possessing a key to the premises, paying the utility bills, regularly picking up drugs there, and bringing drug-sale proceeds there for retrieval by other conspirators

Summary of this case from United States v. Clark

Opinion

No. 14-6398.

10-20-2014

Patricio RENTERIA-SALDANA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Renteria-Saldana v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 20, 2014
574 U.S. 968 (2014)

finding enhancement proper where the defendant did not own or reside at the stash house, but exercised control over it by possessing a key to the premises, paying the utility bills, regularly picking up drugs there, and bringing drug-sale proceeds there for retrieval by other conspirators

Summary of this case from United States v. Clark
Case details for

Renteria-Saldana v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Patricio RENTERIA–SALDANA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 20, 2014

Citations

574 U.S. 968 (2014)
135 S. Ct. 423
190 L. Ed. 2d 307
83 U.S.L.W. 3235

Citing Cases

United States v. Clark

Notably, in many cases where the defendant did not own or rent the premises, but control was deemed to exist…