Opinion
2:22-cv-01664-RFB-EJY
11-16-2022
BAYLEY RENOVICH, an individual; Plaintiff, v. AMAZON SERVICES, LLC; AMAZON.COM, INC.; DOES I-X; AND/OR ROE CORPORATIONS, LLCS COMPANIES, AND/OR PARTNERSHIPS XI-XX inclusive, Defendants.
GABROY | MESSER, Christian Gabroy, Esq. Kaine Messer, Esq. The District at Green Valley Ranch, Attorneys for Plaintiff LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., Wendy M. Krincek, Esq. Emil S. Kim, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants
GABROY | MESSER, Christian Gabroy, Esq. Kaine Messer, Esq. The District at Green Valley Ranch, Attorneys for Plaintiff
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., Wendy M. Krincek, Esq. Emil S. Kim, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSTION TO MOTION TO REMAND (FIRST REQUEST)
Richard E. Boulware, II United States District Court Judge
Plaintiff Bayley Renovich (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Amazon Services, LLC and Amazon.com, Inc. (“Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 20) up to and including November 28, 2022. Plaintiff filed her Motion to Remand (ECF No. 15) on November 1, 2022 and Plaintiff's reply is currently due on November 17, 2022.
This is Plaintiff's first request to extend the deadline to file her Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Plaintiff requests this extension from Defendants due to prior scheduled commitments, both personal and business, and the upcoming holiday, Defendants have agreed to Plaintiff's request.
The requested extension is sought by Plaintiff in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay. No party is prejudiced by this requested extension.
IT IS SO ORDERED.