From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reno v. D'Javid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 13, 1977
55 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Summary

In Reno v D'Javid (55 A.D.2d 876, affd 42 N.Y.2d 1040, supra), the Appellate Division, First Department, summarily dismissed the plaintiff's causes of action based upon medical malpractice, breach of warranty, and assault because they arose out of an illegal abortion performed by the defendant physician which the plaintiff had requested.

Summary of this case from Barker v. Kallash

Opinion

January 13, 1977


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 9, 1976, denying defendant's motion for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, and motion granted to the extent of dismissing and severing the first, second and fourth causes of action in the complaint, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The causes of action based upon medical malpractice, breach of warranty and assault all arise out of an abortion performed by defendant physician on plaintiff, at her request, on June 6, 1970. Such operative procedure was illegal on the date performed and plaintiff, as well as defendant, was guilty of a criminal act as a result thereof (Penal Law, § 125.50, 125.40 Penal). The subsequent expansion of the definition of the term "justifiable abortional act" (Penal Law, § 125.05, subd 3, eff July 1, 1970) did not legalize the act committed prior to the effective date of the amended statute. Plaintiff, having participated in an illegal act, may not profit therefrom. As was stated in Riggs v Palmer ( 115 N.Y. 506, 511-512): "No one shall be permitted to profit by his own fraud, or take advantage of his own wrong, or to found any claim upon his own iniquity, or to acquire property by his own crime. These maxims are dictated by public policy, have their foundation in universal law administered in all civilized countries, and have nowhere been superseded by statute". The third cause of action is completely separated from the allegations in the causes of action dismissed above and is based on an alleged personal assault by the defendant against the plaintiff.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Kupferman, Birns and Capozzoli, JJ. [ 85 Misc.2d 126.]


Summaries of

Reno v. D'Javid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 13, 1977
55 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

In Reno v D'Javid (55 A.D.2d 876, affd 42 N.Y.2d 1040, supra), the Appellate Division, First Department, summarily dismissed the plaintiff's causes of action based upon medical malpractice, breach of warranty, and assault because they arose out of an illegal abortion performed by the defendant physician which the plaintiff had requested.

Summary of this case from Barker v. Kallash
Case details for

Reno v. D'Javid

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET J. RENO, Respondent, v. ISMAIL F. D'JAVID, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1977

Citations

55 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Barker v. Kallash

These maxims are dictated by public policy, have their foundation in universal law administered in all…

Mikel v. City of Rochester [4th Dept 1999

The court erred, however, in denying that part of plaintiff's motion seeking to dismiss the affirmative…