From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Renfro v. Lumpkin

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Nov 9, 2022
Civil Action 1:21cv49 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21cv49

11-09-2022

RASHARD ESAW RENFRO v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, ET AL.


ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THAD HEARTFIELD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Rashard Esaw Renfro, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that a motion for default judgment be denied.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the parties.

ORDER

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. The motion for default judgment (doc. no. 35) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Renfro v. Lumpkin

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Nov 9, 2022
Civil Action 1:21cv49 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Renfro v. Lumpkin

Case Details

Full title:RASHARD ESAW RENFRO v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Nov 9, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21cv49 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2022)