From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Renfrew v. City of Albuquerque

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jul 22, 2024
1:24-cv-00586-WJ-DLM (D.N.M. Jul. 22, 2024)

Opinion

1:24-cv-00586-WJ-DLM

07-22-2024

MARITZA L. RENFREW, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed her Complaint using the form “Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.” See Doc. 1, filed June 10, 2024 (“Complaint”). The only factual allegations in the Complaint state: “Injury to my neck due to sudden braking in the SunVan . . . I have seen several doctors and have to have neck surgery to repair the damage.” Complaint at 3.

Sun Van is a public transportation service operated by the City of Albuquerque for people with disabilities who cannot use regular buses.

United States Magistrate Judge Damian L. Martinez notified Plaintiff that:

The Complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. "The two elements of a Section 1983 claim are (1) deprivation of a federally protected right by (2) an actor acting under color of state law." Schaffer v. Salt Lake City Corp., 814 F.3d 1151, 1155 (10th Cir. 2016). There are no allegations that the City of Albuquerque deprived Plaintiff of a federally protected right.

Order for Amended Complaint at 2, Doc. 5, filed June 12, 2024. Judge Martinez ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. See Order for Amended Complaint at 4 (notifying Plaintiff that failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this case). Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by the July 3, 2024, deadline.

The Court dismisses this case because the Complaint fails to state a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to Judge Martinez' Order for Amended Complaint.

Judge Martinez also notified Plaintiff that she did not sign the Application to proceed in forma pauperis as required by Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and that the Court must strike the Application if Plaintiff does not promptly sign the Application. See Order for Amended Complaint at 1-2. The Court strikes Plaintiff's Application to proceed in forma pauperis because Plaintiff did not sign the Application by the July 3, 2024, deadline.

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court STRIKES Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, Doc. 2, filed June 10, 2024.


Summaries of

Renfrew v. City of Albuquerque

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jul 22, 2024
1:24-cv-00586-WJ-DLM (D.N.M. Jul. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Renfrew v. City of Albuquerque

Case Details

Full title:MARITZA L. RENFREW, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Jul 22, 2024

Citations

1:24-cv-00586-WJ-DLM (D.N.M. Jul. 22, 2024)