From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rendina v. Rutledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Mar 30, 2020
No.: 3:19-CV-241-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2020)

Opinion

No.: 3:19-CV-241-TAV-HBG

03-30-2020

ANTHONY L. RENDINA, Plaintiff, v. RHETT RUTLEDGE, IAN MORLAND, KYLE MILLER, TREVOR TARWATER, DAVID BUCHANAN, FNU COLE, FNU RUSS, and FNU MAPLES, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Anthony L. Rendina, an inmate proceeding pro se in a civil rights action for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion seeking voluntary dismissal of the instant suit with prejudice [Doc. 21]. Upon due consideration, the Court finds the instant motion well taken, and Plaintiff's motion to dismiss his complaint with prejudice [Doc. 21] will be GRANTED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and this action will be CLOSED.

AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT ORDER WILL ENTER.

ENTER:

s/ Thomas A. Varlan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rendina v. Rutledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Mar 30, 2020
No.: 3:19-CV-241-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Rendina v. Rutledge

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY L. RENDINA, Plaintiff, v. RHETT RUTLEDGE, IAN MORLAND, KYLE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Date published: Mar 30, 2020

Citations

No.: 3:19-CV-241-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2020)