Opinion
CASE NO.: SC14-2000
12-23-2014
TITUS K. RENDER Petitioner(s) v. TIMOTHY H. CANNON, ETC. Respondent(s)
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 132001CF021587A000XX
Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. To the extent the the petition seeks to challenge Petitioner's sentences, it is denied as procedurally barred. A petition for extraordinary relief is not a second appeal and cannot be used to litigate or relitigate issues that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in prior postconviction proceedings. See Denson v. State, 775 So. 2d 288, 290 (Fla. 2000); Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So. 2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1992). To the extent the petition raises other issues, it is dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and POLSTON, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
/s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
sh
Served:
JENNIFER ALANI PARKER
TITUS K. RENDER
HON. PAMELA JO BONDI
HON. HARVEY RUVIN, CLERK