From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Renaud v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 25, 2005
901 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D05-1527.

May 25, 2005.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Cheryl J. Aleman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-23106 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Golant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.


Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), we summarily affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's successive rule 3.850 motion, and as in Covell v. State, 891 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), certify conflict with Fitzpatrick v. State, 863 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) and Berthiaume v. State, 864 So.2d 1257 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). See also Campbell v. State, 718 So.2d 886 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Gardner v. State, 707 So.2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)).

STONE, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Renaud v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 25, 2005
901 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Renaud v. State

Case Details

Full title:Wilmann RENAUD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 25, 2005

Citations

901 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Renaud v. State

PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Renaud v. State, 901 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005),…

Museau v. State

Consequently, we affirm the denial of relief, but without prejudice to Museau seeking relief pursuant to rule…