From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Remsen v. Hyams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1902
76 App. Div. 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

November Term, 1902.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J., O'Brien, McLaughlin and Laughlin, JJ.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


We think that the case of Hahl v. Sugo ( 169 N.Y. 116) is an express authority for the granting of this motion. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Remsen v. Hyams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1902
76 App. Div. 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

Remsen v. Hyams

Case Details

Full title:Jane Remsen and Caroline R. Frantz, Respondents, v. Rosalie Hyams…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1902

Citations

76 App. Div. 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)