From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Remsen v. Harris

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 30, 2014
CV 14-03536-GHK (KK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2014)

Opinion

          Lawrence Remsen, Petitioner, Pro se, Chino, CA.

          For Kamala Harris, Attorney General, T. Perez, Warden, Respondents: Nikhil D Cooper, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          HONORABLE GEORGE H. KING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Remsen v. Harris

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 30, 2014
CV 14-03536-GHK (KK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Remsen v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:LAWRNCE REMSEN, Petitioner, v. KAMALA HARRIS, et. al., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 30, 2014

Citations

CV 14-03536-GHK (KK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2014)